American farmers have found themselves at the center of a storm in recent years. As they face many challenges, such as weather, government policies and economic pressures, many feel that they are under attack from multiple fronts. The grievances they hold against their government, climate change activists, globalists, and others are complex and deeply rooted in the struggle to maintain their livelihoods and way of life.
The 2nd main priority on the USDA’s homepage is “addressing climate change” (right behind “advancing racial justice, equity, and opportunity”). Many farmers feel that the burden of “addressing climate change” is being unfairly placed on their shoulders. They argue that the government and climate activists are pushing for policies that will significantly impact their operations without providing adequate support or compensation.
As we have mentioned many times here, atmospheric CO2 is a fantastic fertilizer, and the stated goal of the “climate change” crew is to reduce it, thereby reducing yields.
I’ve been telling you, YOU are the carbon they’re really wanting to reduce. Why do you think the globalists are pushing such a war on agriculture? https://t.co/D2UrqWhmtJ
— Casey Kimbrell (@CBKimbrell) August 9, 2024
The Biden administration’s “30 by 30” initiative aims to conserve 30% of U.S. land and water by 2030. While the goal of protecting the environment is laudable, many farmers worry that this will lead to the loss of their land and livelihoods. Implementing such a plan could introduce new layers of bureaucracy, regulations, or changes in farming operations. This might include mandatory practices or technologies for conservation that could alter traditional farming methods or increase operational costs without clear benefits for the farmers themselves. There is also the worry that the government will confiscate or otherwise force farmers off their lands. They argue that the government should emphasize incentivizing protective practices rather than imposing sweeping restrictions.
In addition to being blamed for ‘climate change’ and expected to alter their operations because of it, farmers are also grappling with economic pressures. The cost of inputs such as seeds, fertilizers, and fuel has been rising steadily, straining their already tight margins. At the same time, commodity prices have been volatile, getting very low in August due to expectations of record yields, making it difficult for farmers to plan and budget for the future.
All while farmers are seeing low prices for their commodities, Americans are seeing their grocery bills skyrocket.
Get ready for more soaring food prices as the 'war on farming' gains steam https://t.co/td009VrKBh
— MAG 1775🇺🇸 (@Mar50cC5O) August 5, 2024
Many farmers feel that their government has not done enough to support them during these challenging times. They point to the lack of meaningful farm subsidies for family farms and the slow pace of regulatory reform as evidence that their concerns are not being taken seriously. The Farm Bill was extended in 2023, and Ag Secretary Vilsack recently announced that he does not think a new one will be passed by the September 30 deadline. Funding farmers has not been a priority, but they were able to push through Biden’s massive Inflation Reduction Act, which included “Green New Deal” provisions to address ‘climate change.’ Many farmers have been skeptical of this, believing it will only exacerbate their economic woes, regardless of what the USDA promises.
The globalist agenda, particularly the influence of figures like Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF), has also been scrutinized by farmers. They worry that the push for a “Great Reset” and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” will lead to the consolidation of power in the hands of a few, further marginalizing small-scale farmers. Farmers’ concerns about globalism are not unfounded. In the Netherlands, for example, the government has proposed a plan to buy out thousands of farms in an effort to reduce nitrogen emissions. This has sparked a wave of protests from Dutch farmers who fear that they will be forced to sell their land and livelihoods.
Just in case you haven’t been attention – there is a Globally coordinated deliberate attack on Farmers across the entire Western World.
This isn’t happening by coincidence – The Globalist agenda seeks to control all land & production of resource by 2030 pic.twitter.com/6YyL9CVbu1
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) August 10, 2024
The parallels between the Dutch situation and the plight of American farmers are striking. Both groups feel that their governments are prioritizing the interests of globalists and climate activists over the needs of their own citizens. They argue that the push for ‘sustainable’ agriculture should not come at the expense of their livelihoods and that a more balanced approach is needed.
Are we dealing with idealists who do not realize what hobbling agriculture will do or is this all part of the Communist playbook?
Mao attacked farmers and starved out millions.
Stalin attacked farmers and starved out millions.
Pol Pot attacked farmers and starved out millions.
Now the Biden regime is attacking farmers.It's not a coincidence. It's the communist playbook.
Wake up. Get ready.
— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) August 8, 2024
The escalating regulatory attack on agricultural producers from Holland and the United States and beyond is closely tied to the United Nations’ “Agenda 2030” Sustainable Development Goals and the U.N.’s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF). Several of the U.N.’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are directly implicated in policies that are squeezing farmers, ranchers, and food supplies around the world. High-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members within the U.N. system helped create the SDGs and are currently helping lead the organization’s implementation of the global plan. If left unchecked, the U.N.-backed sustainability policies on agriculture and food production would lead to economic devastation, shortages of critical goods, widespread famine, and a dramatic loss of individual freedoms.
One of the earliest meetings defining the “sustainability” agenda was the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements known as Habitat I, which adopted the Vancouver Declaration. The agreement stated that “land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals” and that private land ownership is “a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice.” This is why they are waging war on the independent family farmer. They want to own all the land and consolidate their control. “Public control of land use is therefore indispensable,” the U.N. declaration said, a prelude to the World Economic Forum’s now infamous “prediction” that by 2030, “you’ll own nothing.”
Is it a surprise that the Biden-Harris White House opposed a bill to clampdown on the sale of US farmland to China and other adversaries?
The United States is a central front in this war on farmers worldwide. As American farms face the challenges of increasing regulations and market pressures, farmers are fighting to preserve their way of life and their role in feeding the nation. It is crucial that their concerns are heard and addressed, and that a more balanced approach to agriculture and “sustainability” is taken. We should advocate for a return to local farming practices that prioritize food security, nutritional value, and the well-being of rural communities over global corporate interests. Only by working together can we ensure a prosperous future for farmers and the nation as a whole.